Beer Review: Shepherd Neame Spitfire Premium Kentish Ale

Shepherd Neame’s Bishops Finger which I reviewed a few days ago wasn’t bad. In fact, it was pretty good, but it didn’t hit the spot for me. So it’s with a mixture of caution and optimism that I reach for a bottle of its sister beer, Shepherd Neame Spitfire Premium Kentish Ale.

Shepherd Neame Spitfire Premium Kentish Ale bottle

A lot of the bottle and labelling design is the same as for Bishops Finger. So to avoid repeating myself, now would be a great time for you to read that review now, if you haven’t done so already. Go. Do it now. This post won’t be going anywhere while you do…

The shape of the bottle is the same. The neck label has the same, reassuring “1698” heritage and it’s origins in Faversham, Kent.

Shepherd Neame Spitfire Premium Kentish Ale bottle neck

The main front label is a little different

Shepherd Neame Spitfire Premium Kentish Ale front label

The “Shepherd Neame” name, and the funny symbol in-between the text “Since” and “1698” stay. But the peculiar purple style of Bishops Finger is replaced by a good, patriotic red, white and blue colour scheme. The “Spitfire” name jumps out at you. It’s neatly surrounded by the proudly displayed description that it is “Premium”. And not only that, it is also a “Kentish Ale”.

I’m rarely a fan of slogans. Usually they’re an incomplete pun. Or they’re so uninspired that they’ve received less thought than council planning application. But Spitfire’s slogan of “The Bottle of Britain” managed to raise a smile even from me. Good play on words chaps.

The big, wide, rear label is again divided into two sides. One of which has the small print details. The other has a story the length of a medium-sized encyclopaedia.

Shepherd Neame Spitfire Premium Kentish Ale back label

Starting with the small print, this beer, like its sister, Bishops Finger, has EU Protected Geographical Indication. This means you won’t find, say, the French, selling their own Spitfire Kentish Ale. Why we need the European Union’s help to protect our own food and drink remains a mystery. Surely that would be like getting Enron board members to decide who knows your bank account pin number.

The other main small-print details are that this is a 500 millilitre bottle. Its contents have a alcoholic volume of 4.7% which translates to 2.2 UK units of alcohol for this bottle. For such a patriotically themed ale, making it a full British pint would have been the right thing to do instead of a Euro-half-litre. What do you think?

Over on the story side, we learn that this ale has only been going since 1990. Not well established then, by anyone’s standards. It goes on to say that it was brewed to celebrate the Battle of Britain, which played out in the skies over Kent, fifty years before-hand.

The story goes on to praise the Spitfire aircraft. About how it was designed by R J Mitchell. About how it was essential to victory in one of the Second World-War’s defining moments. And about how Shepherd Neame keep the spirit alive with advertising and fundraising for veterans’ charities. All very good.

As with Bishops Finger, Andrew Jefford turns up on the back label again, describing what the drink will be like. He describes the colour as “deep amber”. And smell as being of “tangy malt”. And the tastes and flavours as being of “spicy hops” with a “complex finish”.

Lastly, the postal address in Faversham, Kent, England, is on there. As is the web address of http://www.shepherdneame.co.uk/. And now, it’s time to see if Spitfire is any good.

In the glass, the colour is indeed a deep amber. It also has a good, consistent, yet not excessive head.

Shepherd Neame Spitfire Premium Kentish Ale poured into a glass

The smell is mostly of malt. Whether I’d call it “tangy malt”, I’m not sure. There’s definitely a layer of something spicy or fruity on top of the malty smell. I’d go with calling it “malty and hoppy” in its smell. And I like it.

After a few gulps, the taste, as I see it goes like this… The first thing to hit you is the bitterness. Then you notice the maltiness. And that gets swiftly followed by a hoppy-sour after taste that lingers in the back of your mouth. But does so in a tingly, tangy way.

There’s no doubting that this is an excellent example of what ale is all about. It has lots of strong, complex flavours. It has them arranged in a way that surprises you. And it’s easy to drink.

There are one or two drawbacks however. While, over the course of a few glugs warmed to Spitfire’s big, bold flavours, they won’t be to everyone’s tastes. The initial bitterness will be a big hurdle for some people. And there’s the body. Maybe I’ve been spoiled by live beers with yeast floating around or darker ales that have the consistency of crude oil. But the flipside to its ease of drinkability is that there is something very slightly watery in its lightness. Besides these, it is a little on the gassy side. But these are minor drawbacks.

Spitfire doesn’t apologise for being a bold, flavourful, premium quality Kentish ale. It’s an ale, and it doesn’t try to be anything else. If, like me, you love your ales to be bursting with flavours and patriotism, Spitfire is worth your time and money. Some of you will adore these qualities, others will find it a bit too much. I grew to really enjoy Spitfire, but its strength of bitter-maltiness means I won’t drink a lot of it very often.

Rating: 4.05

Have you tried Spitfire? What did you think?
Got any corrections, criticisms, ideas or requests? Then leave a comment now.

Advertisements

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

6 Responses to “Beer Review: Shepherd Neame Spitfire Premium Kentish Ale”

  1. Chris Welsby Says:

    I enjoyed a pint of Spitfire yesterday evening at the local pub and I have to say it was fantastic! I thought it was brilliant, definitely one to try. The review does Spitfire justice.

  2. Martin Pritchard Says:

    I tried my first (and last) bottle of Spitfire this evening. To me it tasted like an ashtray. As a non-smoker I think I’ll be sticking to the Brains S.A. Gold!

  3. will davis Says:

    Dude:

    You have to teach us some of that great descriptive language. I am soooo sick of the “Peach-oregano aftertaste,” “Apricot, with a slight waft of nails,” (both real descriptions) that we get way too much in the wine country.

    Stay with it.

    Will Davis
    Sonoma (a hint of money, with a definite concrete note), California

  4. heinz1959 Says:

    Well, what can I say. Thanks a lot you guys actually won the war way back when. I’m sure I would not have survived in a totalitarian state… And contrary to dear Martin Pritchard I must say, yes, I really enjoy this here fine Shepherd Neame Spitfire quite a lot. It made its way all to the top of my favourite ales. It’s British, and that’s good. And it’s English. Yeah!
    Best wishes
    Heinz (somewhere in Germany)
    born in 1959

  5. Stan Says:

    This is one of the worst beers I have ever tried, and I’ve tried a lot. The bitterness is unpleasant, and it stays on your tongue like a stain. I can tolerate certain bitter beers, but this one is just ghastly, like it’s been brewed specifically to taste like rubber.

  6. Ketomato Says:

    I was given a bottle of “Spitfire Ale” as a gift at Christmas 2012 here in Canada. I am not a regular beer drinker (so perhaps I CAN have an unbiased opinion) and it tasted great to me! Not too over-bitter, with a subtle taste which did not linger lover-long. Why all the previous rubbish written about it? Get an educated palate fellows!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: